I really appreciate the phrase “student
learning.” Unlike “student achievement”
or “student outcomes” it has not yet become a euphemism for bubble test
scores. I appreciate student learning
because it enables me to imagine a range of indicators for success in the
classroom: true multiple measures.
What can student learning look
like? When you leave my classroom after
music class, I hope there is something you can do, think or remember, something that
you couldn’t before you walked in.
Perhaps you can perform a song, or you can play a simple rhythmically
independent accompaniment; perhaps you made a connection to prior knowledge, or
have deepened your understanding of some concept, such as tempo or dynamics,
and demonstrated that deepening by using that concept to create a short musical
piece. Perhaps you can finger a new
note, or have just acquired some fluency between fingerings that leaves you
feeling successful. In any event, my
aspiration as a teacher is that you leave my classroom having grown in some
small way as a creative person, as a human being.
I acquired this focus on student
learning by going through the National Board
Certification process. This
demanding process requires around 300 hours of work at minimum. You produce a video portfolio and take a
tough six part exam on your knowledge of content and pedagogy. It was in the portfolio process that my brain
got reprogrammed to focus on student learning.
I had a candidate support provider who helped me go over my portfolio
with a fine tooth comb. At each stage Dan
would ask, “What does that have to do with student learning?” Eventually it became my mantra. It has an annoying tendency to slip from my
mouth during faculty meetings. Even if
it doesn’t slip out, it certainly echoes around the inside of my brain.
As a union activist, I experience
a similar echo effect inside my head as we operate the levers of union
influence: negotiations, grievances and so forth. Our
recent foray into Interest Based Bargaining is hobbled by the fact that we
are not yet focused on student learning.
Unlike districts
that truly achieve Labor Management Collaboration, our contract talks still
focus on adult issues, and not student learning. In the most progressive districts, the adults
strive to make the collective bargaining agreement into an education
improvement plan. In my district we have
yet to cross that threshold.
In this sort of context, things
like behavior and climate become ends in themselves. We do not want good behavior in our
classrooms or great school climate because it’s nice to be nice to each other;
we want it because behavior and climate are necessary preconditions to great
student learning. We do not want great
working conditions and competitive pay because teachers “deserve it;” again, we
need these things to the extent that they promote conditions of maximum growth
for students by creating supports for the best teaching and by removing
distractions. Without that focus on the
learning as the most vital institutional goal, the school drifts, and climate and
behavior, working conditions and pay, deteriorate anyway.
Why is a laser-like focus on
student learning beneficial to children?
It is the best way that educators can express that they care for the
students. If we expect that our
classrooms will be incubators of intellectual, artistic and ethical growth,
this indicates that we want the students reach their potential. We all arrive at school with baggage. To focus on behavior or pay as an end is to
get mired in the baggage – all the reasons that we can’t treat each other
well. To put the learning at the center
of the institution is to put the student at the center in a truly profound way.
How does this express itself in
actual classroom practice? In the
planning process the teacher keeps standards and curriculum in mind. Not that binder on the shelf, but living
curriculum which has been internalized.
I strive to make the constant connection between the activities I select,
and the things that are appropriate for a particular cohort of students to
master. For example, I might look at a
group of sixth graders and see that they need some conscious experience of 6/8
time, so I plan a series of lessons culminating in an opportunity for them to
improvise and/or compose a piece of music in 6/8 time. I love using a creative act for assessment –
to me, it demonstrates true understanding.
Without a focus on standards and
curriculum, the focus becomes the activities themselves, and the question
becomes not what the students will learn, but what the teacher will do to entertain
in order to get through the day. An
activity centered classroom is a teacher centered classroom.
It may seem ironic that the
direction of institutional attention to student learning, seemingly external to
the self, can have such a salutary effect.
To lose that focus, however, is to lose the soul of the school, and
cripple us in the muck of the psychic baggage we carry. To lift one’s eyes, to see that we can be
better than we are, is to express faith in ourselves and in our students. From time to time we may fail, but it is in
the relentless movement towards growth that the members of a school community
best express their humanity. This is why
we need to focus on the learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment